Skip to content

System suppliers

Clinical Indications for System Suppliers and Digital Teams

Today the indication is free text in the directions: there is no separate indication field. A 2025 hospital study found that making a dedicated field compulsory raised recording from 29% to 76%, and a 2026 review calls for “agreed international standards to guide system vendors”.

Software code on a laptop screen beside a phone

How are indications recorded now?

As free text, and they still are. At present, clinicians add the indication as free text to the directions on the electronic prescription. In EMIS, the free text is stored and offered from a pick list on future issues of prescriptions, for all patients. There is no separate indication field. In 2006, one practice using Vamp Vision built indications into its computerised practice formulary, and FAQ 3 hoped they would become “a standard feature of computerised prescribing packages”.

Other software has used pick lists. A 2014 news item on this site reported that LiMA, used in Department for Work and Pensions work capability assessments, offered a pick list of possible indications, never mandated, with free text always available.

What happens when the field is compulsory?

In one hospital system, recording rose. In Christchurch, New Zealand, the share of medicines with an indication went from 29% to 76% after the field became compulsory, “with only a small increase in ‘rubbish text’”, and no change in medicine use (Pairman et al, 2025).

A 2019 UK study, however, concludes that “systems that force prescribers through mandatory fields to document clinical indications may be counterproductive”. See hospitals.

What does the research say about standards?

That they are needed. A 2026 systematic review of 24 studies, 16 of them on antimicrobials, found that “only one study examined prescriptions for all medicines”, and its authors call for “agreed international standards to guide system vendors” (Pairman et al, 2026).

In 2006, FAQ 7 said indications “should be standardised as much as possible”, and proposed a small Clinical Indications Development Unit to hold a dictionary of indications and work with the British National Formulary.

What features does Dr Masters’ material describe?

  • Recommended phrases for the prescriber to pick from a list, not standard phrases added automatically, with the prescriber medicolegally responsible (FAQ 7).
  • Room for individual indications, which FAQ 7 says should continue.
  • An opt-out phrase, “patient preference no indication”, and a way to tell the pharmacist to leave the indication off the label (FAQ 4, proposed in 2006).
  • Safety messages and stop dates, such as “yearly blood pressure check required” for the contraceptive pill (FAQ 5).
  • Departure audits: counting repeat items that leave the surgery without a stated indication (FAQ 7).

Can the Sample Directory be built into a system?

It is not offered for that. The Sample Directory was compiled by medical student Mubeen Yousuf at Highfield Surgery, from the surgery’s repeat prescriptions, and the version on this site is dated 2 February 2006. It is an example, not a working directory. It is free for practices and medicines teams to reuse with credit, but Dr Masters has not offered it to system suppliers, because of the medicolegal implications: the prescriber remains responsible for the wording (FAQ 7).

How do prescriptions reach the pharmacy now?

Mostly electronically. In 2024/25, 1.13 billion items, 97% of all items dispensed in England, went through the Electronic Prescription Service (NHSBSA). The indication travels through it as part of the directions (FAQ 15).

How can we work with Dr Masters?

FAQ 7 says working with drug dictionary and computer suppliers “will be vital”. To discuss indication fields, use the contact page.

Questions

In one hospital system in New Zealand, recording rose from 29% to 76% with only a small increase in ‘rubbish text’, and no change in medicine use. A 2019 UK study warns that mandatory fields “may be counterproductive”.

A 2026 systematic review calls for “agreed international standards to guide system vendors”. Only one of its 24 studies examined prescriptions for all medicines.

It is free for practices and medicines teams to reuse with credit, but Dr Masters has not offered it to system suppliers to build into their products, because of the medicolegal implications.

Dr Masters recommends that prescribers pick recommended phrases from lists rather than have standard phrases added automatically, and that the prescriber stays medicolegally responsible.

Next step

See how indications travel through electronic prescriptions.

Clinical indications and electronic prescriptions sets out what is known about EPS and how to check the label.

Last reviewed

Dr Nigel Masters with a patient at Highfield Surgery

Get in touch

Have a Question About
Clinical Indications?

If you have a question that is not adequately answered elsewhere on the site please contact us and we will do our best to answer it.